It’s comfortable to hold and customizable, so if you use it for everyday use, you can fully consider purchasing the previous generation “Microsoft Classic IntelliMouse”, which is cheaper. I think that it is a very excellent mouse for those who have been using the IE3.0 clone mouse since the end of production of IE3.0 and those who have a cover or a grip, so why not pick it up? Is it?Īfter using it for a week, I truly wanted it. The sensor behavior, short lift-off distance, etc. “Microsoft Pro IntelliMouse” retains the magnificent shape of IntelliMouse Explorer 3.0 but has enough performance to compete with current gaming mice. Pro IntelliMouse doesn’t revolutionize the brand but introduces a host of modern enhancements and features that make it worthy of the IntelliMouse heritage. Also, I don’t think you will feel that much difference during the actual operation. I didn’t feel a big difference, but the speed of sliding was a little faster with Microsoft Pro IntelliMouse.
Specifically, the side buttons are textured in a line shape to prevent slipping, and at the same time, I felt it was easy to grasp the position of the buttons. The only change is that the surface of the side buttons is made of rubber and has fine cuts. The click sound is somewhat lower and more subdued on the Pro IntelliMouse. It seems that the feeling around here is different because it uses buttons that are more responsive than before.
Pro IntelliMouse has shallower left and right button strokes and a firmer click feeling. The overall button layout and click feeling can be described as a slight difference from the Classic IntelliMouse. The nostalgic shape remains the same, as well as the contents have been reborn as the latest gaming mouse for gaming PCs. The numbers can differ broadly depending on the optical or laser mouse pad you use, but it’s a fairly short category. The result of measurement after calibration, the lift-off distance was around 0.8 mm. The DPI is 400, 800, 1600, 3200 respectively and the polling rate is 1000Hz. It should be noted that due to the nature of the tool, the results may vary depending on the environment. As a result, the sensor is for the most part precise. Note: I also tested accuracy of the sensor on the mouse pad “Corsair MM350”.
0 kommentar(er)
